Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robson, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society; 1956; v. 112; issue.1-4; p. 241-262;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.JGS.1956.112.01-04.12
© 1956 Journal of the Geological Society, London, Legacy

A sedimentary study of the Fell Sandstones of the Coquet Valley, Northumberland

Douglas Arthur Robson, M.Sc. Ph.D. F.G.S.

The Fell sandstones are about 1000 feet thick in the Coquet valley. They form the upper part of the Tuedian, which is the lower division of the Lower Carboniferous in Northumberland. Current-bedding is generally present, and occasionally shows deformation structures. Directions of current-bedding indicate a source lying to the north-east.

The heavy mineral content of the underlying Cementstone Group is distinct from that of the Fell Sandstones. The lower part of the latter, described as the mixed zone, contains a mineral assemblage common to both groups.

The results of mechanical analysis show a marked degree of uniformity of grade-size throughout the Fell Sandstones. Coarser beds occur only very occasionally. Careful sampling from individual units of current-bedding indicates that all parts of a single unit generally yield almost coincident cumulative curves. Adjacent units of current-bedding often differ from one another in grade-size, evidently in response to the varying strengths of tho depositing currents. To the same cause may be ascribed the variations in the percentages of heavy minerals in samples taken from adjacent current-bedded units.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scottish Journal of GeologyHome page
D. A. Robson and D. A. Robson
The structural history of the Cheviot and adjacent regions
Scottish Journal of Geology, 1977; 13: 255 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]