Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society; 1963; v. 119; issue.1-4; p. 397-400;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.119.1.0397
© 1963 Journal of the Geological Society, London, Legacy

Discussion

Dr C. H. HOLLAND asked the author for further information on the Dictyonema that he had mentioned as recorded from the upper part of the Manx Slates. Were the specimens those that had caused some interest on their discovery in the Manchester Museum some ten years ago? It had often been suggested that an Irish Sea land-mass, including the Isle of Man, was a significant component of Cambrian (and Tremadocian) palaeogeography. In this context the presence of these dendroid graptolites in the Manx Slates was of crucial importance. Could Dr Simpson comment upon the origin and authenticity of the record?

Professor R. M. SHACKLETON said that the uncertainty about the Manx Slate Dictyonema remained. There was no doubt that the specimens in the Manchester Museum were of a dendroid and probably a Tremadocian Dictyonema, as the President [Professor Bulman] had confirmed some years ago when the specimens were submitted to him by Dr J. E. Gillott, but there was doubt, first expressed by Lamplugh, as to whether the specimens really came from the Manx Slates as H. Bolton claimed. Lamplugh’s apparent reasons for suspicion were, first, that neither he, Bolton, nor anyone else could find another Dictyonema at Cronkshame and, secondly, that this locality was near a ‘crush-breccia’, close to which fossils could not have survived. The second argument was invalidated by Gillott when he showed that the breccias were slide-breccias. Gillott had the matrix of the fossil sliced, compared it with slices of the Cronkshame rock and with one

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.