Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society; 1967; v. 123; issue.1-4; p. 88-92;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.123.1.0088
© 1967 Journal of the Geological Society, London, Legacy

DISCUSSION

Dr A. T. J. DOLLAR said that this stimulating contribution to the geology of Scilly raised afresh controversial issues, particularly relating to gravels containing far-travelled erratics in, or associated with, the drift described, and to the likely role of ice in the transport and deposition of such constituents of this drift, which were investigated particularly by A. Smith (1858), G. Barrow (1906), C. W. Osman (1928) and by the speaker at intervals between 1954 and 1966.

Regarding the extent of the elliptical submarine base of the two-granite pluton of Scilly, the speaker asked why the authors had adopted 30 square miles for this plane area rather than the value of nearly 50 square miles suggested by available bathymetric data. Further, in view of the elliptical plan of the pluton, what new evidence was there for regarding the mass as a boss, with its implication of a nearly circular cross-section, instead of the laccolite first proposed by C. W. Osman or the asymmetrical laccolithic form suggested by the speaker (in D. L. Jones, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1963), after a detailed structural study of the mass.

In connexion with two large supposed inclusions of the former sedimentary envelope of the mass in the first granite, on White Island, St Martin’s, had the authors any views on the ambiguous field and laboratory evidence associated with this question, particularly in respect of the dyke-like schistose and tourmalinized body concerned ?

In the two main granites, the authors had drawn attention to the

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.