Lyell Collection

Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PEARSON, D. A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society; 1970; v. 126; issue.1-4; p. 125-150;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.126.1.0125
© 1970 Journal of the Geological Society, London, Legacy

Problems of Rhaetian stratigraphy with special reference to the lower boundary of the stage

DAVID AMORY BAPTY PEARSON

The use of ‘Rhaetic’ as an international lithostratigraphical term is rejected in favour of a national terminology. The establishment, type-region and a possible standard section for the Rhaetian, and a marker point for its base are discussed. A critical examination is made of the evidence involved in the suggestion that the Norian and Rhaetian are contemporaneous and that the latter cannot be used as a chronostratigraphical unit. World-wide reinterpretation of faunal and field observations does not support this proposition. Alterations to the lower boundary of the Rhaetian are found to be unnecessary and the suggestion that the Germanic facies should be split from the remainder of the stage and placed in the Jurassic is rejected. The Rhaetian is reaffirmed as the final stage of the Triassic, and the base of the Pre-planorbis Beds supported as the lower boundary of the Jurassic.